Skip to content
Silent Potato.
SearchTagsEN/中文
  • Start
  • Writing
  • Columns
  • Projects
  • Research
  • Work with me
  • Photos
  • About

Research · preprint · 0.1

Interpersonal Risk Analysis Protocol: From Relationship Material to Facts, Hypotheses, and Actions

A research-design and protocol paper: it proposes a material-organization and risk-annotation protocol aimed at safety actions, covering intimate and general interpersonal relationships, and defines AI's role as a structured co-pilot.

LiyukLiyukPublished August 14, 2026
  • #Relationships
  • #Interpersonal Analysis
  • #Anti-Scam
  • #Psychology
  • #Human-AI Collaboration
  • #Work & Leadership

Share to

XWeiboTelegramWhatsAppLinkedInFacebook

WeChat

Scan with WeChat

Open this article on your phone, or forward it to a friend.

Enjoy this site?

orSubscribe via RSS
← PreviousWhen AI Lowers Workflow Barriers: How to Redivide Functional Lines and Business Lines
Next →Workplace Relationship Analysis Protocol: Power, Responsibility, and Structural Positions

Keep reading

Maybe related to this one.

  • WritingRecruiting and Professional Relationships (Part 3): Turning 'Connections' into Long-Term ReciprocityProfessional relationships are not a resource pool to be tapped, but a network of trust built slowly through real collaboration, measured help, and clear boundaries.Read on →

    shared 2 tags

  • WritingRecruiting and Professional Relationships (II): A Referral Is Not Forwarding a Job PostingA responsible referral is not about prompting an application, but about helping both sides gain enough truthful information to judge whether it is worth getting closer.Read on →

    shared 2 tags

  • ResearchThe Laws of Human Motivation: The Situational Motivation ModelA theoretical synthesis, conceptual model, and application framework: it redefines motivation from "whether someone has drive" into a situated process of "whether motivation is generated, whether it can be converted into behavior, and whether it can be sustained," integrating self-determination theory, expectancy-value, goal setting, self-efficacy, and behavior models; bringing in perspectives from developmental psychology, business management, and organizational and occupational psychology to propose a three-layer "Situational Motivation Model" with a "growth axis," which it concretizes in the workplace into six components — task, goal, incentive, feedback, development path, and leadership/relationship — connecting to measurable outcomes such as engagement, commitment, performance, burnout, and turnover, introducing the enterprise life cycle as an enterprise-level moderating variable, and ultimately yielding nine falsifiable laws of motivation.Read summary →

    shared 2 tags

© 2018–2026 Liyuk. Built slowly, published openly.

ElsewhereGitHub ↗X ↗LinkedIn ↗Email ↗Links ↗Favorites ↗RSS ↗
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0